IF they ever get these networks to work correctly my guess would be they will try to get the city government to support them. Until then I would imagine they will be a big money looser for the Co's involved. One of the consequenses of jumping in head first I guess. Superior Wireless New Orleans,La. www.superior1.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Matt Liotta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 8:23 AM Subject: Earthlink (was Re: [WISPA] RE: Madcity muni report)
> Looks like Infoworld has their own take on Earthlink... > > http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20070427/tc_infoworld/88116 > > Interestingly, the article is the first report I have seen in mainstream > press that Earthlink muni has very few customers. > > -Matt > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> I don't know why you don't believe the 2000 subscriber figure. The goal of > >> the article is clearly not to pump the system up. > >> > >> > > I for one wouldn't believe it considering the word is that Earthlink > > doesn't even have a total of 2000 paying subscribers across all their > > Wi-Fi networks. > > > > -Matt > > > > > > -- > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
