Changing the laws happens MUCH quicker if a mass of people openly oppose it. Your country was founded on that very principle.
Lonnie On 5/2/07, Butch Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 2 May 2007, Alan Cain wrote: > Dawn DiPietro wrote: >> Justify it anyway you like. Civil disobedience is not a viable >>solution. I don't see a large number of people stepping up to the >>plate and defending your position. >Whoa, there now! Civil disobedience is always a viable solution. Civil disobedience is (in the context that Dawn was using it) the breaking of existing law. In spite of your 60's heritage, breaking the law is NOT an acceptable action. I understand your position (in theory, not practice), but CHANGING law through political influence is one thing. Ignoring it is not a smart thing. -- Butch Evans Network Engineering and Security Consulting 573-276-2879 http://www.butchevans.com/ My calendar: http://tinyurl.com/y24ad6 Training Partners: http://tinyurl.com/smfkf Mikrotik Certified Consultant http://www.mikrotik.com/consultants.html -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-- Lonnie Nunweiler Valemount Networks Corporation http://www.star-os.com/ -- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
