Inline again :-)

> Behalf Of Jack Unger
> 
> Mac,
> 
> Thanks for replying to my concerns and suggestions.
> 
> Have you tried using 5 to 10 feet of vertical separation between the
> antennas rather than mounting them all at the same height? 10 feet of
> vertical separation should be enough to prevent one AP transmitter from
> overloading another AP receiver.


[Mac says:] 

 Now you are talking the "Jack Unger" talk that makes me sit up and take
notice :-) 

I have not tried the vertical separation because it looks so unprofessional
(although is a professional move) to have 3 sectors spread out over thirty
feet and it also puts 2 of my three sectors at a disadvantage due to the
height loss. We cover a lot of rugged territory, conquer (really not very
well) massive 90' Oak trees and connect subs as far as 20 miles off these
towers. It is a fine idea and one I may have to move to!

> 
> Secondly, single-channel bandpass filters are available which will
> provide additional receiver protection from nearby transmitters
> operating on non-overlapping frequencies.

[Mac says:] 

That sounds like the way I will go. I appreciate the idea and suggestion. I
don't know why I haven't thought of that before. I guess I have never bought
or even had need of a bandpass filter till now. Well truth be known it seems
I have needed them for years, but didn't realize it till today.


> 
> Finally, higher-priced antennas normally have a higher front-to-back
> ratio which increases isolation (minimizes interaction) between the
> antennas. A minimum f/b ratio of 30 dBm is recommended.


[Mac says:] 

 We have always bought and used PacWireless antennas and thee 16.5dbi 120*
VPOL sectors have at least a F/B ratio of 25db. I realize the more you spend
the better F/B ratio you get and that is where my original thread started -
- looking for some good sectors :-)


> 
> Keep in mind that without dealing with these antenna isolation issues,
> you will likely have the same problems using two 180* sector antennas as
> you have had using three 120* sector antennas.

[ 
[Mac says:] 

 That is fine advice Jack and I appreciate the fine guidance. You have made
me think - - and that may be a dangerous thing. Now - - let me go order some
bandpass filters and hang them on one of these troubled tower to see what is
gonna happen. I will post back here and let you know my results.

Thanks again Jack!!


Mac Dearman





> 
> jack
> 
> 
> Mac Dearman wrote:
> > See in line please
> >
> >
> >> Behalf of Jack Unger
> >>
> >> Mac,
> >>
> >> Before you discard the idea of using three 120* sectors are you
> >> absolutely certain that the "separation" issue is really due to the
> >> antennas not being far enough apart? Have you thoroughly looked at
> other
> >> reasons why there could be interference between three APs like:
> >
> >
> > [Mac says:]
> >
> > Well Jack - I'd like to think that I have exhausted the other
> possibilities
> > :-) but I am always willing to listen.
> >
> >> 1. Using three cards on a single motherboard in one enclosure without
> >> sufficient shielding between them.
> >
> >
> > [Mac says:]
> >
> >  All of our sector arrays utilize 3 different enclosures with one radio
> to
> > the enclosure and then I try to separate the enclosures (and antennas)
> as
> > far as possible.
> >
> >> 2. Using three APs that are configured on frequencies that are too
> close
> >> together and are interfering with each other?
> >
> >  [Mac says:]
> >
> >  Unless we deploy 4 90* sectors we use non overlapping channels (1, 6 &
> 11)
> >
> >
> >> I guess what I'm asking is (before you go spend money on antennas that
> >> may or may not solve the problem) what equipment are you currently
> >> using, how is it configured, and how far apart can you actually get
> >> three sector antennas on the 25G tower?
> >>
> >> jack
> >
> > [Mac says:]
> >
> >
> >  I have come to the conclusion that it is interference from the
> backplane of
> > the antennas due to not having adequate separation from each other.
> These
> > small towers (although 180') like Rohn 25G aren't but 12" across - so
> you
> > wind up with the 3 sectors only 1' apart at their bases.
> >
> > I wish you had some more ideas :-), but thanks for the thought and the
> time!
> >
> > Mac
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Jack Unger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> FCC License # PG-12-25133
> Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993
> Author of the WISP Handbook - "Deploying License-Free Wireless WANs"
> True Vendor-Neutral Wireless Consulting-Training-Troubleshooting
> FCC Part 15 Certification for Manufacturers and Service Providers
> Phone (VoIP Over Broadband Wireless) 818-227-4220  www.ask-wi.com
> 
> 
> --
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> 
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> 
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

-- 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to