I recall on the moto list, maybe it was chuck, determined that 2.4 and 5
gig phones also use 900 to either send or recieve.
That would be why they are alll 900MHz as well.
George
Mike Ireton wrote:
Hi All,
I have numerous examples of cordless phones that all claim to be
'2.4ghz' or '5.8' ghz, but in fact are 900mhz models. This is maddening
and frusterating for subs on 900mhz systems such as trango and canopy as
these interfere pretty bad with their service. This misleading labeling
has also led to situations where subs have gone to get new phones,
different manufacturer and models, and they also turn out to be 900,
increasing customer frusteration and giving us a black eye. The fcc
numbers on the phones give us the right information - it's the product
packaging and product parkings on the phone and base station that are
wrong. Isn't there something wrong with this? Aren't manufacturers of
this stuff required to say '900mhz' if it's 900mhz and not misrepresent
it as 5.8ghz when it's not?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know
your feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists.
The current Board is taking this under consideration at this time. We
want to know your thoughts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Would you like to see your advertisement here? Let the WISPA Board know your
feelings about allowing advertisements on the free WISPA lists. The current
Board is taking this under consideration at this time. We want to know your
thoughts.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
