To be honest, I don't agree with providers restricting traffic on a
per-protocol basis, with, perhaps, the exception of SMB ports (137-139
& 445) simply because there very few people legitimately uses SMB over
WAN outside of a VPN.

The problem with allowing any blocking, even with full disclosure, is
that there is very little choice in the market (2-3 service provider
options is typical for most people, and a lot don't even have that).
Likewise, the major service providers tend to mirror each other
heavily enough that they are more or less interchangeable.  In other
words, it's not a matter of "well, if comcast doesn't allow bit
torrent, I'll just go to a provider that does".  If they are allowed
to block, they will...the negative repurcussions of blocking are quite
small compared to the benefit of forcing customers to their own
services.

By and large, I don't agree with the approach that some of the list
members have espoused  that would seem to suggest that such actions
are ok for the small mom & pop providers but not for the major service
providers.  If you are going to provide Internet access, do your part
to further the culture of a content-neutral policy.  If nothing else,
you'll at least be the provider that gives the alternative for
customers want a more net netrality-minded service provider.









On 10/26/07, Jeromie Reeves <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My take is that this is the that fateful "first step on a very
> slippery slope". Today they rate shape the traffic, next week they out
> right block it. I agree that any provider needs to use what ever tools
> they have to keep users "in line". The problem that Forbes is pointing
> out (I think) is that they are not telling customers they are doing
> this [rate shaping]. It also stems from the bad use of the word
> "unlimited" who's root is the heyday of dial-up [in terms of hours,
> not bandwidth or quantity of data). Regardless of weather I see it
> correctly or not, Very Good Work and we all should get writing.
> www.house.gov/writerep
>
>
> On 10/26/07, Sam Tetherow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'll crack open the can of worms....
> >
> > What are you suggesting here Forbes?  If it's just truth in advertising
> > then I'm behind you 100%.
> >
> > If however you are suggesting that an ISP should not be able to block
> > traffic of a particular type I will have to disagree.  Currently I do
> > not shape traffic beyond bandwidth limits on my customers and blocking
> > netbios traffic at each AP.  I would hate to lose the ability to block
> > ports 137-139 though from a security standpoint.
> >
> > I know there are many other ISPs that aggressively shape their bandwidth
> > just to stay in business.  Forcing them to open up the pipes will most
> > likely end up with poorer service for more customers.
> >
> > If I were an uninvolved 3rd party it would be interesting to see the
> > market react to legislation that forced no traffic shaping beyond
> > bandwidth caps, but as an independent ISP I don't think I want to try to
> > live through it.
> >
> >     Sam Tetherow
> >     Sandhills Wireless
> >
> > Forbes Mercy wrote:
> > > After reading a story this morning on a industry related blog I wrote a 
> > > letter to my Republican Congressman.  I sent the same to my two Democrat 
> > > Senators but just took out the reference to being a Republican. :)  
> > > Anyway I'm putting it here just so you can remember that only we can keep 
> > > the pressure up on our representatives on issues that affect us and this 
> > > is as good of a subject as any to keep beating the drum:
> > >
> > > "A year ago I wrote you when the AT&T purchase was being approved stating 
> > > we had to stay vigilant against the carriers blocking each other in what 
> > > we refer to as Net Neutrality.  You wrote back, and I thank you for that, 
> > > stating there is no real proof of providers blocking any traffic.  This 
> > > despite my proof at the time that Clearwire was already blocking any 
> > > Voice over IP service (Internet Phone) other then theirs.
> > >
> > > I felt your stand was naïve because trusting the Telephone companies is 
> > > like trusting the prisoners to watch the prison.  We're both good 
> > > Republicans who want to let companies grow as they may to achieve 
> > > profitability but the exclusionary tactics encouraging monopolistic 
> > > behavior is alive as always in this industry.  Here is a link showing how 
> > > the wholly unregulated cable industry continues to set the standard of 
> > > censorship and gradual demise of a free and open Internet:
> > >
> > > http://www.informationweek.com/blog/main/archives/2007/10/comcast_is_bloc.html?cid=nl_IWK_daily
> > >
> > > It is my hope you will pay heed to my warning that open enterprise does 
> > > not include making Internet access different by companies who make no 
> > > public claims in their terms and conditions to their customers.  This 
> > > constitutes fraud as people buy Internet based on the belief that their 
> > > subscription entitles them to a free and open network as it was built.
> > >
> > > I again greatly encourage you to consider Net Neutrality as a priority, 
> > > or at the minimum, special written notification to their customers of 
> > > blocked content, so the public can make an educated choice.  These 
> > > companies advertise they are an equal choice when they are not.
> > >
> > > Thank you,
> > > Forbes Mercy"
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at 
> > > ISPCON **
> > > ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
> > > ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
> > > ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
> > > ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
> > > http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> > >
> > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> > >
> > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> > >
> > > <a 
> > > href="http://mail.shwisp.net/spam/dspam.cgi?template=history&user=tetherow&retrain=spam&signatureID=16,4722160f226407888450014";>!DSPAM:16,4722160f226407888450014!</a>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at 
> > ISPCON **
> > ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
> > ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
> > ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
> > ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
> > http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at 
> ISPCON **
> ** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
> ** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
> ** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
> ** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
> http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

** Join us at the WISPA Reception at 6:30 PM on October the 16th 2007 at ISPCON 
**
** ISPCON Fall 2007 - October 16-18 - San Jose, CA   www.ispcon.com **
** THE INTERNET INDUSTRY EVENT **
** FREE Exhibits and Events Pass available until August 31 **
** Use Customer Code WSEMF7 when you register online at 
http://www.ispcon.com/register.php **

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to