Todd,

If Clearwire went away tomorrow, small WISPs, WISP distributors and WISP
product manufacturers would be far better off.

Yes, I agree, WISPs would be much better off, if Clearwire disappeared.
Yes, Sure if Clearwire is severally harmed financially by this, and they are slowed, WISPs will benefit.

My view was based on the fact that Clearwire isn't going to disappear.
My view was based on that a Clearwire/Sprint partnership is not required for Clearwire or Sprint to have success in Mobile/Fixed Wireless. This news was a failure of a partnership, not a failure of a company or competitor. Actually, we are now left with two potential competors.... a Sprint and a Clearwire. It could create a situation where Sprint and Clearwire compete against each other to lower market price and be more of a threat to WISPs. Sure a combined entity is would result in a stronger more complete coverage company under one umbrella, but that is a advantage for stock holder's, and a bad thing for Wisps, not necessarilly the worst thing for WISPs. There is another factor called "competition". It is not CableCos or Ilecs that hurt WISPs, it was the competition between the Cable Cos and Ilecs, that drive the price down and the speeds up, and that hurt WISPs worse. Competition between two large dominient telco Wireless provider, will hurt WISPs worse. Secondly, jsut because Clearwire's stock falls doesn't necessarily mean it will hurt Clearwire, its to early to determine that. Its an opportunity for profit, for stock to be bought cheap, if they can find a way to raise its value tommorrow. Stockholder Investors suffering does not necessarilly mean Clearwire suffering.

For this Split to be advantageous to WISPs, one of three things must occur...
1) Clearwire must suffer from severe financial harm.
2) Doubt in the Telco industry on viabilty of WiMax, because the failed partnership.
3) Clearwire or Sprint stock value must stay low.

Sure the above may be likely, we can hope, and we can predict, but before we jump for joy, we need to see that the above actually occurs.

I'd like to point out a DSL lesson on failure..... Remember Northpoint? Verizon started due diligence to purchase Northpoint, then gathered competitive information, and pulled out of the deal, made a public sceptacle, and watched Northpoint die from the repercussion of the tumbling stock. Yeah, if that happens, great for WISPs.

What would they be buying?
The technology wouldn't be compatible, from billing to the wireless
transmission system to the frequency bands. They could just as easily buy
the names and addresses for homes in an small-WISP area and send
sales/marketing incentives out.

That I disagree with. In most "traditional" evaluations that I have seen, very little value gets given in consideration for "Equipment Infrastructure". The intent would be to replace equipment. Nor does "sales/marketing" guarantee new subscribers. What a WISP sells is Time to Market advantage to Prevent Burn rate. This is not necessarilly, customers, this also can be relationships and contractual agreements. WISPs offer an abilty to profit from otherwise lost opportunity, the revenue lost, until customers convert. I believe that over 50% of the first years revenue from a subscriber is goes towards recovering "sales/marketing costs". Converting customers over, with a full replacement of gear, gaining efficiencies of bypassing the sales/marketing process, is at miniumum adding a 6x month revenue to a WISPs evaluation, and thats a minimum assuming Clearwire thought they could win the business on their own without underbidding. Requirement to underbid to win business, would even escalate the Value of the WISP, considering the higher monthly revenue that could be achieve for many years down the road, at proven higher prices. Then there are agreements with Landlords. Property owners are the barrier to entry to tenant buildings. Even if they thought WISP's agreement would not hold up... Buying a WISPs existing agreements would save years in cost legal negotiations. Not to mention every dollar a WISP pay for an agreement, a landlord would try and negoatiate 4 dollars from a well funded Telco. Sure with the Non-Line of Site vision, this may not appear to apply, but is the "non-line-of-sight" vision a reality? A Clearwire does not need to buy a WISP to enter a market. But Clearwire could be more profitable, if they do. If Clearwire does not buy WISPs, it is not because it wouldn;t be advantageous to them, it is because they would jsut consider it a distraction because the dollar value of the typical WISPs operations today have not gotten large enough to justify the time. That is where consolidations would help WISPs. As WISPs consolidate, they grow to larger sizes becoming attractive for aquisition.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- From: "Todd Easterling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 1:19 PM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal


For the record, everyone in the WISP business (manufacturers and WISPs) I
talk to about the collapse of the Sprint-Clearwire deal is jumping for joy
about the news. I am too. WISPs do not need more competition, and a
"national WISP" like clearwire which added 49,000 new subs in the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 is clearly competition. Their market coverage
increased from 34 markets last quarter to 48.

Yes, it is unlikely that a satisfied WISP customer would switch to
Clearwire. But what we are talking about is competition for new customers.
And anything that slows down a "national WISP" that picked up 49,000 new
subs in one quarter is good for the small business-WISPs and the smaller
manufacturers that supply those WISPs. Also, Clearwire isn't likely, in my
opinion, to care about buying most small WISPs. What would they be buying?
The technology wouldn't be compatible, from billing to the wireless
transmission system to the frequency bands. They could just as easily buy
the names and addresses for homes in an small-WISP area and send
sales/marketing incentives out.

If Clearwire went away tomorrow, small WISPs, WISP distributors and WISP
product manufacturers would be far better off.

Todd


________________________________________

Todd Easterling

VP, Corporate Development & Marketing

Solectek Corporation

www.SOLECTEK.com




-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tom DeReggi
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 8:55 AM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

I'm not sure it is an issue of Clearwire "over-evaluation".
I personally think it was just a publicity stunt to bring in some new cash
last quarter, for both companies.

Clearwire and Sprint each own 2.5G spectrum, and its equally worth what it
is worth.
The real issue is whether someone is willing to pay what its worth, to just
deliver WiMax, and share the profits?
Companies realize that sometimes they are better off just concentrating on
what they do best, and take 100% of the profit on the Business model that
they have proven to be Solid.
Sprint's mobile division has a clear business model that makes sense, around

the EVDO 3G/4G mobile data products. Sprint's business broadband division
has a clear business model around Fiber Optics. Sprint's Long distance
division has a clear model for selling bits nation/world wide.
But when it comes to WiMax, do they have a clear model that will benefit
them?
Its all about EGO and public perception, and Tier1 carriers do not like
someone else getting the Spotlight, its just not good for Investor
Relations.

Personally, I believe it will help WISPs more, for Clearwire to succeed. It
will likely set a record of high evaluation for the industry.
Public perception will be... If Clearwire can't do it, and isn't worth it,
how can a WISP be?

I'll make an unpopular statement that I feel is just plain reality, and the reason Telcos are not likely going to be real competition for WISPs or vice
versa.
The Wireless business is for scavengers and bottom feeders. Any way you
slice it, for a WELL FUNDED Mammoth company, Fiber Optic will ALWAYS be a
better business proposition for the PROVIDER, whether talking about business

or residential.  And for Mobility, 3G and 4G already delivers enough
capacity for MOST applications, that are guaranteed success business models
for mobility.  Sprint knows this, which is why there is Internal turmoil
within Sprint, on whether to WiMax or Not.  This press release is NOT an
announcement of failure and bad news, it is an announcement that Sprint has
common sense, and back to reality.

As far as the Fixed Wireless business and WISPs.... Our industry has many
clear business models.  And our technology doesn't need to be the "BEST",
for us to have successful business models. "WiMax or Equivellent" is an
enabler technology, to enable small entrants to enter the game and play
ball. In comparison to Sprint market share, its a tiny tiny playing field.
But thats OK, in comparison we are tiny tiny providers.  There are many
advantages to being small.  And small things still have great potential
proportionaly.  On my playing field, the big boys don't have an advantage
over me.  I (along with WISPs nationwide) will continue to kick Telcos'
butt, on our Fields.  My customers will continue to get better value, and
WISP will continue to succeed. If Telcos are smart, they'll never play ball

on our fields, there is just no need to play a game that they will loose at.

Telcos have a much larger playing field, where they are guaranteed to shine.

As far as Clearwire, and same goes for companies like Fiber Tower....  If
they are smart, they will start buying smart WISPs. The mentality that they

will come and just take the customers and take the market is just not a
reality. There are just to many reasons that Subscribers have selected their

local WISP. As long as WISPs are in the game, we are a threat to them being

recognized as the definitive "wireless" provider, and their business model.
WISPs in the market will devalue the market, because WISPs sell cheap
because they can. So in return Clearwires or equivellent also undersell at
a loss, to be competitive.  The only way to beat WISPs, is to buy their
customers, and convert them, and take the savy ambitious WISP executives out

of the game.  A telco is much more likely to buy a Clearwire, if Clearwire
is in markets where they have extinguished other competition. Because then
they have a market for sale, not just a provider. WISPs are still considered

a problem, that telcos are figuring out how to deal with. They are afraid
WISPs case studies will become the venue for next generation CLEC/ISPs. If
Clearwire killed the threat by buying them, and transferred the leverage to Clearwire, at the same time as increasing market share, it would help their
evaluation. The truth is... a company like Clearwire would IMMEDIATELY
obtain cost savings through the aquisitions, such as via consolidating
backhauls, and be able to raise prices.  Sure I recognize that Clearwire
Egos have likely not realized this yet, but give it time.  The value of
WISPs is not just their customers, its their relationships, whether it be
with customers or real estate/property owners.

Mark my words.... In two years, Clearwire will either be bankrupt, or they
will be one of the major consolidators, BUYING up local WISPs.

Just my 2 cents.

Tom DeReggi
RapidDSL & Wireless, Inc
IntAirNet- Fixed Wireless Broadband


----- Original Message ----- From: "Brad Belton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 9:20 AM
Subject: RE: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal


Wow, already down 30%+ this morning.  Hate to say I told ya so (not your
Frank, but the list in general) on the over-valuation of Clearwire, but I
told ya so.

Best,


Brad



-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Frank Muto
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 11:36 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: [WISPA] Sprint and Clearwire scrap WiMax deal

Sprint and Clearwire scrapped a pact to build a nationwide high-speed
wireless network based on WiMax.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119457536653487513.html

The two companies signed a letter of intent in July to pursue the
partnership, which they hoped to finalize within 60 days.
But the complexities of the transaction and the departure last month of
Gary
Forsee as Sprint's chief executive officer made
it too difficult to reach a final pact, the people say.
The unraveling of the preliminary agreement is a blow to Clearwire. The
company, founded by cellphone pioneer Craig McCaw,
has staked its future on WiMax, a longer-range cousin of Wi-Fi that can
theoretically provide wireless broadband access from
laptops and cellphones at speeds comparable to what cable operators
provide.



Frank Muto
President
FSM Marketing Group, Inc
www.secureemailplus.com











----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date:
10/22/2007 10:35 AM




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.5/1085 - Release Date: 10/22/2007 10:35 AM




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to