I assumed that too but would like to be sure I am making the correct
assumptions. I also wonder what he feels should be allowed. I know how
I feel about it and lacking information, assume everyone feels the
same =)

On 1/18/08, Jason Hensley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would think that by personal portable devices he means things like
> cordless phones, wireless headsets, etc etc.   If I understand that right, I
> would have to concur wholeheartedly.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jeromie Reeves
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2008 5:12 AM
> To: WISPA General List
> Subject: Re: [WISPA] Wireless industry slams NAB's white
> space'misinformation'
>
> Can you explain why you feel that way?
>
> On 1/17/08, Marlon K. Schafer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've sent a note to WIA and asked if they'd be interested in a
> > discussion focused on finding common ground between them and us.
> >
> > It's my belief that WISPA needs to fight tooth and nail to keep
> > personal portable devices out of the whitespaces band.  At least at
> > first (really forever as far as I'm concerned).
> >
> > Anyone have a problem with that as a firm stance?
> > marlon
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jack Unger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2008 10:05 PM
> > Subject: [WISPA] Wireless industry slams NAB's white space
> 'misinformation'
> >
> >
> >
> >     Wireless industry slams NAB's white space 'misinformation'
> >
> > The row over US 'white space' spectrum continues, with the newly
> > formed Wireless Innovation Alliance
> > <http://wirelessinnovationalliance.com/>
> > stepping up its campaign to convince the FCC and the industry that
> > wireless devices can be used in these areas without interfering with
> > digital TV signals.
> >
> > The WIA last week accused the broadcast industry, as represented by
> > the National Association of Broadasters (NAB), of misleading the
> > public just as the FCC prepares to test updated wireless devices from
> > the likes of Microsoft (the original prototypes failed
> > non-interference testing, though the WIA claims this had more to do
> > with poor testing methods than real problems for digital TV signals).
> > These products are designed to work in an unused channel within the
> > digital TV band, but to switch to another channel if the first is needed
> for a television signal.
> >
> > The WIA was formed last month to lobby the FCC to complete testing and
> > move forward with technical guidelines. Six House of Representatives
> > members wrote to FCC chairman Kevin Martin recently to urge a final
> > decision in the next few months. The transition from analog to digital
> > TV is due to be completed in February 2009.
> >
> > "Upcoming testing of white space concept devices is meant to assist
> > FCC engineers to craft the strongest possible rules while ensuring
> > maximum public benefit. Yet instead of respecting the FCC's desire to
> > perform concept testing, your recent public misinformation campaign
> > has confused the testing process and misled the public and policy
> > makers," stated the WIA in a letter
> > <http://wirelessinnovationalliance.com/files/WIA%20letter%20to%20NAB%2
> > 0re%20WS%20testing.pdf>
> > to NAB president David Rehr....
> >
> >
> >
> > <http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/17/wia_nab_white_space_spat/>
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc.
> > Serving the Broadband Wireless Industry Since 1993 FCC License #
> > PG-12-25133 Author of the Cisco Press Book - "Deploying License-Free
> > Wireless WANs"
> > Vendor-Neutral Wireless Training-Troubleshooting-Consulting
> > Phone 818-227-4220   Email <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> > WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> > http://signup.wispa.org/
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ----------
> >
> > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
> >
> > Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
> >
> > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
> >
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to