On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Mike Hammett wrote: >If you needed virtualization of some type, you could install it as >the host OS, then install your Mikrotik or Asterisk or... on top.
It's not that it was something I "needed", but am using it since it is already installed. In order to get the particular projects I am working on, the way it is now is the best option. >I guess I meant things that we can't already get somewhere else. >Mikrotik themselves has to do a lot of things, but we can do Xen on >our own. Since I don't direct MT in their plans (in fact, it seems the best way to ensure something DOESN'T happen is for me to ask for it), I can't offer you any advice here. In some respects, I agree with your sentiment. I just use what's there. -- ******************************************************************** *Butch Evans *Professional Network Consultation * *Network Engineering *MikroTik RouterOS * *573-276-2879 *ImageStream * *http://www.butchevans.com/ *StarOS and MORE * *http://blog.butchevans.com/ *Wired or wireless Networks * *Mikrotik Certified Consultant *Professional Technical Trainer * ******************************************************************** -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
