The only 6500/7600 that can support full tables requires a  
sup720-3bxl, which itself is much more expensive than a complete GSR.

-Matt

On Aug 12, 2008, at 9:58 AM, Bryan Scott wrote:

> You could also do a 6500 or 7600 with dual Supervisors & power
> supplies.  Mine carries full routes, dual GigE to the world, supports
> GigE, FE, ATM OC3, DS3, Packet Over Sonet (over OC3 or OC12), 48 & 96-
> port ethernet blades, and the list goes on.  They have AC or DC power
> supplies.  And they are big. Every port can either be switched or
> routed.
>
> -- Bryan
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 7:45 AM, Jeff Broadwick wrote:
>
>> Hi Gino,
>>
>> GSRs are overkill for what you are doing.  In the Cisco world, a
>> couple of
>> mid-range VXRs would be a better solution.
>>
>> Or you could use a couple of ImageStream Rebel or Gateway routers
>> for a
>> fraction of the price.
>>
>> Either way, I'd use two routers in a redundant configuration with
>> BGP and
>> VRRP/HSRP for link and hardware failover.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Jeff
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by Rapid Link, and is
> believed to be clean.
>



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to