Using StarOS, we have tested them with 3.5GHz antennas. They got what we would expect them to get with respect to SNR, with a slight loss due to the 3.5GHz antennas.
Two issues... 1. We purchased some of the original XR3's, but then they came out with the new version XR3 - 3.7 which had different center frequencies so they would not associate with the original XR3 that we had at the AP. 2. We have had 3 of the XR3 - 3.7 radios that have either lost a significant amount of signal from the AP, or stopped associating altogether. On the StarOS forums, there was some talk of this be attirbuted to non grounding thet antennas. But as it stands, I think we had 3 bad radios, then the 3 that we originally bought that are useless now due to the center frequency issue. At $260 per radio, that's alot of $$ in useless radios. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Charles Wyble" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "WISPA General List" <wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2008 7:41 PM Subject: Re: [WISPA] Ubiquiti 3.65 > Joel White wrote: >> Anyone out there using the Ubiquiti 3.65 legally registered with the FCC? >> Any ups or downs or knowledge you care to share? >> >> > > I would love to get an answer to this as well. > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
