Hello, Yes, so far they are working great!! We have 2 links installed and another 10 planed. We like using integrated units so we do not have to mess with LMR and taping connectors. However we are not getting the distances we need with the Integrated. We are going to use integrated on 1 side and connectorized on the other for links from 7 to 13 miles. This is because a few of the towers we are on we do not want to put a 2 foot dish on. Beyond the 13 miles we are planning to use 2 foot dishes on both sides. The max ERIP limit is kind of funny for the band. Below is a good link that will help you understand it. We use the max channel size. http://www.ligowave.com/wiki/index.php/LigoPTP-3_FCC_EIRP_Rules Ligo is in the process of getting approval for the other part of the 50mhz in 3.65. Right now we only have 25mHz of the 3.65. This means that with a channel size of 20mHz you have only 1 channel. We have not tested putting 2 radios on one tower yet. We plan to vertically separate them and put one on vertical and one on horizontal, but again we have not tested that yet. Hope that helps, I will keep you posted on our testing. From: motorola-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:motorola-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Gino Villarini Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2009 2:21 PM To: Motorola Canopy User Group Cc: WISPA General List Subject: [Motorola II] Ligowave 3.65 Experience? Anyone has deployed this units? Gino A. Villarini g...@aeronetpr.com Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. tel 787.273.4143 fax 787.273.4145
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/