Travis, I have done lots of research on the MLPPP solution, and tried various configs, if you get it working, please let me know. We also are setup the same, except to at&t, and also use the CEF solution, however..
We also have used the xincom twin routers. They work pretty good, for a balancing solution, not so much as a bonding solution. www.xincom.com If you find a better solution, please let me know. Richard Mesh.net -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Travis Johnson Sent: Friday, January 23, 2009 10:22 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: [WISPA] bonding Hi, We currently provide DSL service using Qwest. We are a "megahost" provider, meaning we have a DS3 directly to Qwest, and then we can sell DSL circuits using our bandwidth, etc. In the past, we have been able to "bond" multiple DSL lines using a Cisco router on the customer side and then using Cisco's CEF protocol. This provides a true bonded connection, because it does a "per packet" load balance. Is there a better solution? I have to use a Cisco on our NOC side, but I would prefer to find something cheaper. Any ideas on what protocol may work? MLPPP or ????? Travis Microserv ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
