Curious.

Have u tried to disable the IPv6 stack in Vista ?

We are using monowall on wired networks with Vista, once the IPv6 stack is
disabled, have not seen any issues with DHCP.


Regards 


Faisal Imtiaz

-----Original Message-----
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On
Behalf Of Joe Miller
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 11:17 PM
To: WISPA General List
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Monowall and Microsoft Vista machines


Yes I do, they are RV Parks. They are great money makers, but this Vista
issue is getting out of hand.



----- Original Message ----
From: RickG <rgunder...@gmail.com>
To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org>
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 9:27:44 PM
Subject: Re: [WISPA] Monowall and Microsoft Vista machines

Joe, I've seen Vista have issues connecting with all kinds of access points.
I usually have the customer get a different router and it works. Which takes
me to a question: Why do you have customers connecting laptops directly to
you? Do you run a hotspot?
-RickG

On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Joe Miller <joe.mil...@dslbyair.com>
wrote:
>
>
> I'm having a hell of a time with Vista machines connecting to my Monowall
router. I found this regarding Windows Vista cannot obtain an IP address
from certain routers or from certain non-Microsoft DHCP servers, and gives
the fix for the computer. HOW MANY PEOPLE are knowledgable enough with Vista
to fix there own machine? >support.microsoft.com/default.as...33/en-us and
Monowall's latest version:
>
> >m0n0.ch/wall/ "04/11/2009 - m0n0wall 1.3b16 released This beta 
> release improves IPv6 support (by providing more control over RAs, adding
DHCPv6, allowing IPv6 DNS servers, enabling IPv6 webGUI access, etc.), adds
initial basic support for secondary IP addresses, patches a kernel security
issue and adds support for Broadcom BCM5722 NICs."
>
> Has anyone dealt with this before? Does anyone know how to make Vista work
on their Monowall routers without having to assign a static address on the
Vista machine? This is starting to become a pain in the a$$. The customer
will complain that they cannot connect to the captive portal and will say it
worked in the last place they were at. It kind of makes me wonder why
Microsoft pulled such a rotten joke on end-users.
>
>
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----

WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/



      


----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to