This doesn't work (can't get to port 81; if it's MT check to see that you have an admins list and a default drop input policy on it): http://64.146.146.1:81/graphs/iface/uplink-to-pud/
> I did have to upgrade a backhaul link to one of the towers recently. It tested plenty fast but pings would jump to 2000 to 3000ms when you ran a ping test. My *theory* is that the link was able to handle the speed but not the number of "threads" running through it. Do you mean PPS? Threads are built on processes, a CPU thing. Being in Washington I'm sure you love trees. And Microsoft =P Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth." --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marlon K. Schafer <o...@odessaoffice.com>wrote: > We test with speakeasy.net most of the time. > > It can be "jerky" too. We've got nearly 400 wireless or fiber to the home > (plus servers) subs on a 20 meg pipe. Here's the current usage: > http://64.146.146.1:81/graphs/iface/uplink-to-pud/ > > I did have to upgrade a backhaul link to one of the towers recently. It > tested plenty fast but pings would jump to 2000 to 3000ms when you ran a > ping test. My *theory* is that the link was able to handle the speed but > not the number of "threads" running through it. > > It was some Airaya gear that had been in place for the better part of 5 or > 6 > years. I sure wish more of my gear would sit there that long and just work > and work and work! I think I only did one firmware upgrade too! > > Don't forget that we also charge per bit. Not per speed. Our users likely > use less bandwidth than the average one does. Out here, with our high > costs > for bandwidth make that matter. > > laters, > marlon > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Robert West" <robert.w...@just-micro.com> > To: "'WISPA General List'" <wireless@wispa.org> > Sent: Saturday, September 12, 2009 7:03 AM > Subject: [WISPA] Customer to Bandwidth Ratio > > > > I'm sure this has been asked before but what ratio are some of you using > > for > > customer vs. available bandwidth? We aren't experiencing any problems at > > the moment but I want to know when we should start looking to add > > capacity. > > Our competitor is running 20 up and 20 down but has 500+ customers on it > > and > > if I do a speed test the pings are fast, 32 or so, but it's really > "jerky" > > on the download and uploads. So...... What is a good REAL WORLD ratio > > that > > you use that is smooth? > > > > Thanks! > > > > Robert West > > Just Micro Digital Services Inc. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
