Lots of people are doing that with NS2s and MTs. I think across the board NS2 as the CPE if I'm not mistaken - maybe a few Tranzeos out there.
Up to you to decide which you'd rather use. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 "When you have eliminated the impossible, that which remains, however improbable, must be the truth." --- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:21 PM, Mark McElvy <mmce...@accubak.com> wrote: > I suppose that is a good term, I would like to be able to redistribute > service to small pockets of houses, 6-12, without putting up a full > blown AP/BH setup. Any one else doing this? I normally use 5.8 for BH > typically and 2.4 for clients, I was thinking of maybe using a PS2 to > receive/BH and connect it to an NS2 with small omni to redistribute. > Both would be in a bridge and allow the clients connected to connect to > the main AP for PPPoE authentication. Is this a reasonable or ridiculous > solution? Any other solutions others are using that might be better? I > know I could use MT but that would add complexity to the mix I don't > need. > > > > Mark > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
