Are you passing traffic over the link yet? CCQ numbers are very inaccurate until traffic is going through. They usually improve.
Mike wrote: > I just put up a new repeater site today. I am using MT for the > P2P. I aligned the dishes by eyeball and a compass bearing, and > think I'm close. The signal at both ends is -71 dBm, but am > expecting better. I am going to "wag" one or the other (or both) > dishes, but wondered where to start. This list has many answers, so > I thought I'd start here. > > The master side, 165' feet up shows Tx/Rx CCQ (%) at 88 78 and varies > from 86/78 to 91/86 > > The slave end, about 65' on top of a power pole shows Tx/Rx CCQ (%) > at 84/90 and the Tx varies from 76 to 86 but usually stays in the mid 80s. > > Signal to noise is about 47 on both ends. > > Which dish would you wag first based on these readings? > > Mike > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > -- Randy Cosby Vice President InfoWest, Inc 435-674-0165 x 2010 http://www.infowest.com/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/