Paul Gerstenberger wrote: > There are a number of blackhole routes and ACL lines for unallocated IPs, > that's why it's so long. Probably overkill. > > I'm not running NAT on the mikrotik, but I'm planning doing so with some of > these IPs. > > [ad...@mikrotik] > /routing ospf export > # feb/11/2010 05:34:32 by RouterOS 4.5 > # software id = QQQQ-QQQQ > # > /routing ospf instance > set default comment="" disabled=no distribute-default=never in-filter=ospf-in > metric-bgp=20 \ > metric-connected=20 metric-default=1 metric-other-ospf=auto metric-rip=20 > metric-static=20 \ > name=default out-filter=ospf-out redistribute-bgp=no > redistribute-connected=as-type-1 \ > redistribute-other-ospf=no redistribute-rip=no redistribute-static=no > router-id=10.0.4.3 > /routing ospf area > set backbone area-id=0.0.0.0 comment="" disabled=no instance=default > name=backbone type=default > /routing ospf interface > add authentication=none authentication-key="" authentication-key-id=1 > comment="" cost=10 \ > dead-interval=40s disabled=no hello-interval=10s instance-id=0 > interface=ether1-gateway \ > network-type=broadcast passive=no priority=1 retransmit-interval=5s > transmit-delay=1s \ > use-bfd=no > /routing ospf network > add area=backbone comment="" disabled=no network=10.0.4.0/27 > > > > Here are the relevant routes: > > RS-1# ip show routes > > Destination Gateway Owner Netif > ----------- ------- ----- ----- > default ZZZ.ZZZ.ZZZ.25 Static HREC-EIA > 10.0.4.0/27 directly connected - WISP-201 > YYY.YYY.YYY.0/24 10.0.4.3 OSPF_ASE WISP-201 > XXX.XXX.XXX.24/30 directly connected - HREC-EIA > > [ad...@mikrotik] > ip route print > > Flags: X - disabled, A - active, D - dynamic, > C - connect, S - static, r - rip, b - bgp, o - ospf, m - mme, > B - blackhole, U - unreachable, P - prohibit > > # DST-ADDRESS PREF-SRC GATEWAY DISTANCE > 0 ADo 0.0.0.0/0 - 10.0.4.1 110 > 2 ADC 10.0.4.0/27 10.0.4.3 ether1-gateway 0 > 30 ADC yyy.yyy.yyy.0/24 zzz.zzz.zzz.1 ether2-local 0 > 44 ADo xxx.xxx.xxx.24/30 - 10.0.4.1 110 > > -Paul > Strange...everything looks right to me. Routing tables are as I would expect. You don't happen to have any ACL's being applied to the interface that the Mikrotik is attached too? What happen if you eliminate using OSPF for now and just setup the configuration using static routes? Does it work then?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
