Actually we have found Ruckus to do very well with multipath! i.e. boat docks, moving water, moving boats, moving rolled tin structure, generating killer multipath, kills EVERY OTHER ROUTER/AP EXCEPT RUCKUS. try it , you'll like it.
Chuck Profito 209-988-7388 CV-Access, Inc. www.cv-access.com / cprofito'at'cv-access.com Providing Broadband Internet Access to California's Rural Central Valley -----Original Message----- From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Rubens Kuhl Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 11:30 AM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] yet another "WiMAX vs LTE" article > Since their beam forming is dynamic, I would expect it to work very well > in that environment. As Ruckus beamforming is based on selecting a receiver instead of combining the signals, it should indeed deal with ducting but not too well with multi-path. > No Beam forming is expected from Ubiquity....... just MIMO... If Quantenna, Celeno or the other chip makers come up with a cost-effective 802.11n beamforming solution, and they claim they will, may be UBNT rethinks this issue. Rubens ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
