Fred, Can you see Lightsquared selling wholesale to a WISP? jack Fred Goldstein wrote: At 8/10/2010 10:15 AM, Blake Bowers wrote:Although they do use that satellite word a lot, elsewhere in their page they talk about 40,000 "cell" sites - as in possibly they are doing their backhaul using satellite, but their last mile by terrestrial?I don't have a clue, but it appears they have a fairly big slug of money. One big warning flag I saw was they were talking about their satellite being built by Boeing right now - only one? No backup?Lightsquared is the new name of a company that used to be called SkyTerra. They are and have been in the satellite business. The mobile satellite business did not take off the way the FCC thought it might a decade and a half ago, when it allocated frequencies to them. You might remember Iridium, for instance. The birds flew, but the business didn't, and it carried on as a bankruptcy asset, hardly encouraging new competition. And cellular spread more widely than anticipated, with better roaming, making satellite less necessary. SkyTerra had some customers too, but didn't exactly set the world on fire. So for the past decade, the satellite industry has been asking for permission to use their frequencies for "auxiliary terrestrial component" (ATC) operation. In other words, ground-based mobile networks, like cellular. The National Broadband Plan supports this, so the FCC is likely to allow SkyTerra --> LightSquared to recycle their frequencies in the 1.4/1.6 GHz range. SkyTerra plans 40,000 cells to cover 92% of the population; this includes both "coverage" (rural) and "capacity" (urban, after cell-splitting to accommodate growth) cells. Satellites can then provide fill-in coverage outside of terrestrial cell-site range, if you have a dual-mode phone. LightSquared's business model is to sell wholesale, while MVNOs do the retail sales. This makes a lot of sense, since setting up a retail network is costly, while there are existing retail networks (e.g., store chains and carriers who don't own wireless networks of their own) that could easily take on a new product line, and handle the billing for their own customers. The top two CMRSs (ATTM and VZW) don't want to sell wholesale, leaving MVNO support mostly to Sprint; this new network could substantially improve that market. I don't know their backhaul strategy but I expect it'll be like Sprint's and T-Mobile's -- use competitive facilities where available, private microwave when possible, and ILEC Special Access when all else fails. That last resort has been something like 90% of the time, which is why there's so much of a push to regulate Special Access rates. VZ and ATT make their real profits nowadays from those leased lines, selling to ISPs and wireless carriers. It's basically an unregulated monopoly. -- Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/ +1 617 795 2701 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ -- Jack Unger - President, Ask-Wi.Com, Inc. Network Design - Technical Training - Technical Writing Serving the Broadband Wireless, Networking and Telecom Communities since 1993 www.ask-wi.com 818-227-4220 jun...@ask-wi.com |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/