150'? Would't the Loco be better? It's a little less sensitive too on RX which might help prevent picking up interference, reflections etc.
Greg On Aug 30, 2010, at 12:08 PM, RickG wrote: > You didnt mention if clear LOS or not. If so, Nanostation2. > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 11:48 AM, Jason Hensley <ja...@jaggartech.com> wrote: > Need something that will go a very short distance (less than 150’) with power > that’s able to adjust down to where it doesn’t burn up radios. Has to mount > outside, and no, there’s no way to run Ethernet or fiber in this situation. > Bandwidth is not that big of a deal – 3-6meg will be more than enough. Need > only for VoIP traffic between two buildings. > > > Thanks! > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/ > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > WISPA Wants You! Join today! > http://signup.wispa.org/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org > > Subscribe/Unsubscribe: > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless > > Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
