On 09/23/2010 12:28 AM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> Any hams on the list who know if the XR5 and XR3 meet Part 97
> rules?  I think the high-speed digital emission is legal on the 3.5
> and 5.7 GHz ham bands... and these would be neat to have for VHF contests!
I don't see that as a problem

Leon WA4ZLW
> At 9/22/2010 06:49 PM, you wrote:
>> Pretty impressive for 5.8Ghz. I'm aware of numerous long 2.4G links, but
>> this is clearly a record for 5.8G.
>>
>> http://www.gizmag.com/go/7878/
>>
>> It was even over water, all be it, it was also on top of a mountain a mile
>> high :-)
>> They said they pulled off 5 mbps.
>>
>> Its funny, I remember conversatiosn when SR5s first came out, where some
>> people stated they wouldn't risk using them for long links over 10miles or
>> so, because a low price product likely was lower grade.  I got to say, way
>> to go Ubiquiti!



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to