They listed all "fixed" devices must be below 75 meters HAAT. A lot of 
customers fixed CPE could be well above that as well.

On 09/23/2010 01:50 PM, Brian Webster wrote:
>
> If you are on a high mountain and there are also a lot of other high 
> locations around you your HAAT number could still be low. If however 
> you are on a high mountain and the rest of the area all the way around 
> your site is much lower, your HAAT figure will go up. Sites built on 
> side hill locations with the hill rising above in part of the radius 
> will greatly reduce the HAAT number.
>
> http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/bickel/haat_calculator.html
>
> "How is the HAAT determined? A HAAT value is determined by taking 50
>
> evenly spaced elevation points (above mean sea level [AMSL]) along at 
> least
>
> 8 evenly spaced radials from the transmitter site (starting at 0 
> degrees [True North]). The 50 evenly spaced points are sampled in the 
> segment between 3 to 16 km (formerly 2 to 10 miles) along each radial. 
> The elevation points along each radial are averaged, then the radial 
> averages are averaged to provide the final HAAT value. Terrain 
> variations within 3 km (2 miles) of the transmitter site usually do 
> not have a great impact on station coverage."
>
> Brian
>
>
>
>
> *From:* wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] 
> *On Behalf Of *Fred Goldstein
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 23, 2010 4:36 PM
> *To:* WISPA General List
> *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Transmit Antenna Height
>
> This item alone may be the show-stopper, the poison pill that makes it 
> useless to WISPs in much of the country.
>
> In places where the routine variation in elevation is more than 75 
> meters, there will be houses (subscribers) that are more than 76 
> meters AAT. I notice this in the areas I'm studying, both in the east 
> and in the upper midwest.
>
> In a place like Kansas, nobody is >75m AAT. But in the woody 
> Berkshires of Western Massachusetts, the UHF space is needed to get 
> through the trees, and a significant share of houses are >75m AAT. 
> Also, if you want to cover a decent radius, the access point needs to 
> be up the hill too. 75 meters isn't a mountaintop; it's just a little 
> rise.
>
> It makes no sense to absolutely ban fixed use at a site that is 100m 
> AAT if the nearest protected-service contour is, say, 50 miles away. A 
> more sensible rule would be to follow broadcast practice, and lower 
> the ERP based on height, so that the distance to a given signal 
> strength contour is held constant as the height rises. Hence a Class A 
> FM station is allowed up to 15 miles, and if it is more than 300 feet 
> AAT, then it is allowed less than the 3000 watts ERP that apply at 
> lower heights.
>
> Maybe the lawyers want to have more petitions to argue over.
>
> At 9/23/2010 04:07 PM, Rich Harnish wrote:
>
>
> 65. /Decision. /We decline to increase the maximum permitted transmit 
> antenna height above ground for fixed TV bands devices. As the 
> Commission stated in the /Second Report and Order/, the 30 meters 
> above ground limit was established as a balance between the benefits 
> of increasing TV bands device transmission range and the need to 
> minimize the impact on licensed services.129 Consistent with the 
> Commission’s stated approach in the /Second Report and Order /of 
> taking a conservative approach in protecting authorized services, we 
> find the prudent course of action is to maintain the previously 
> adopted height limit. If, in the future, experience with TV bands 
> devices indicates that these devices could operate at higher transmit 
> heights without causing interference, the Commission could revisit the 
> height limit.
>
> 66. While we expect that specifying a limit on antenna height above 
> ground rather than above average terrain is satisfactory for 
> controlling interference to authorized services in the majority of 
> cases, we also recognize petitioners’ concerns about the increased 
> potential for interference in instances where a fixed TV bands device 
> antenna is located on a local geographic high point such as a hill or 
> mountain.130 In such cases, the distance at which a TV bands device 
> signal could propagate would be significantly increased, thus 
> increasing the potential for interference to authorized operations in 
> the TV bands. We therefore conclude that it is necessary to modify our 
> rules to limit the antenna HAAT of a fixed device as well as its 
> antenna height above ground. In considering a limit for antenna HAAT, 
> we need to balance the concerns for long range propagation from high 
> points against the typical variability of ground height that occurs in 
> areas where there are significant local high points – we do not want 
> to preclude fixed devices from a large number of sites in areas where 
> there are rolling hills or a large number of relatively high points 
> that do not generally provide open, line-of-sight paths for 
> propagation over long distances. We find that limiting the fixed 
> device antenna HAAT to 106 meters (350 feet), as calculated by the TV 
> bands database, provides an appropriate balance of these concerns. We 
> will therefore restrict fixed TV bands devices from operating at 
> locations where the HAAT of the ground is greater than 76 meters; this 
> will allow use of an antenna at a height of up to 30 meters above 
> ground level to provide an antenna HAAT of 106 meters. Accordingly, we 
> are specifying that a fixed TV bands device antenna may not be located 
> at a site where the ground HAAT is greater than 75 meters (246 feet). 
> The ground HAAT is to be calculated by the TV bands database using 
> computational software employing the methodology in Section 73.684(d) 
> of the rules to ensure that fixed devices comply with this requirement.
>
> /130 The antenna height above ground is the distance from the antenna 
> center of radiation to the actual ground directly below the antenna. 
> To calculate the antenna height above average terrain (HAAT), the 
> average elevation of the surrounding terrain above mean sea level must 
> be determined along at least 8 evenly spaced radials at distances from 
> 3 to 16 km from the transmitter site. The HAAT is the difference 
> between the antenna height above mean sea level (the antenna height 
> above ground plus the site elevation) and the average elevation of the 
> surrounding terrain.
> /
> 67. In reexamining this issue, we also note that the rules currently 
> do not indicate that fixed device antenna heights must be provided to 
> the database for use in determining available channels. It was clearly 
> the Commission’s intent that fixed devices include their height when 
> querying the database because the available channels for fixed devices 
> cannot be determined without this information.131 We are therefore 
> modifying Sections 15.711(b)(3) and 15.713(f)(3) to indicate that 
> fixed devices must submit their antenna height above ground to the 
> database.
>
> 68. We continue to decline to establish height limits for 
> personal/portable devices. As the Commission stated in the /Second 
> /Report /and Order/, there is no practical way to enforce such limits, 
> and such limits are not necessary due to the different technical and 
> operational characteristics of personal/portable devices.
>
> --
> Fred Goldstein k1io fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
> ionary Consulting http://www.ionary.com/
> +1 617 795 2701
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to