Why not?! Who would prevail if it ever came to a court?!
From: wireless-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:wireless-boun...@wispa.org] On Behalf Of Tom Sharples Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 7:00 PM To: WISPA General List Subject: Re: [WISPA] Brute Force Attack on Mikrotik Gateway I've often wondered, is it legal for the receipient of this sort of thing, to retailiate with e.g. ping or curl storms? Tom S. ----- Original Message ----- From: Robert West <mailto:robert.w...@just-micro.com> To: 'WISPA General List' <mailto:wireless@wispa.org> Sent: Friday, October 01, 2010 2:57 PM Subject: [WISPA] Brute Force Attack on Mikrotik Gateway Just had to deal with a brute force attack on a MT router acting as a gateway. Came from these two IP addresses.. 59.42.10.38 61.155.5.247 Looked them up, they turn out to be pretty common for this sort of thing. Added a firewall rule to drop them and they are no longer filling my log. Some may want to do the same for these jokers. Robert West Just Micro Digital Services Inc. 740-335-7020 Logo5 _____ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
<<image001.gif>>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
