Military radar

-----
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com



On 10/30/2010 3:24 PM, Fred Goldstein wrote:
> At 10/30/2010 02:53 PM, Chuck Hogg wrote:
>> Anyone else catch this?
>>
>> http://www.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2010/db0720/DOC-300297A1.pdf
> I seem to recall its coming up in a thread around then, but can't
> find it offhand.  However, it is tied to the TDWR issue, and in
> August, WISPA and SpectrumBridge set up a TDWR database to help get
> this fixed.  So just this month, the FCC has started processing new
> approvals for the 5475-5725 band.  Good work on WISPA's part.  Maybe
> the UBNT radios will get the DFS needed to pass.
>
> I don't really see why DFS is needed if you stay away from the
> 5600-5650 TDWR band, but that's the FCC for you... maybe there are
> some other radars on the other frequencies though.  That band is
> legal in most other countries, so it's in the products.  And of
> course we Part 97 licensees can play (I do mean that literally, not
> commercial use) with radios on all sorts of frequencies, like 5850-5875. ;-)
>
>    --
>    Fred Goldstein    k1io   fgoldstein "at" ionary.com
>    ionary Consulting              http://www.ionary.com/
>    +1 617 795 2701
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> WISPA Wants You! Join today!
> http://signup.wispa.org/
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org
>
> Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
> Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WISPA Wants You! Join today!
http://signup.wispa.org/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org

Subscribe/Unsubscribe:
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/

Reply via email to