I like the last sentence better. "White space devices will provide a "competitive alternative to existing broadband providers," he argued, and noted that the unlicensed nature of the newly free spectrum should lead to faster real-world deployments than a spectrum auction".
Jack Unger wrote: > Speechless, I am... > > > "Critics of US broadband want one of two things: "open access" rules that > would > create greater ISP competition of the kind that actually existed in the early > 2000s or, barring that, net neutrality rules to keep ISPs from abusing their > market power. But according to FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell, we don't > need > either policy—white space devices make both approaches unnecessary... " > > <http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/09/fcc-commish-no-need-for-net-neutrality-we-have-white-spaces.ars> > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
