On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Greg Ihnen <os10ru...@gmail.com> wrote: > Rubens, > > Thanks for the reply! > > I'm using a 5GHz AirMax back haul (PtMP) to two 2.4GHz APs (All UBNT > gear). The 5GHz back haul has never broken a sweat. Our "upstream" is a > 1M/256K high latency connection so there just isn't that much data to move.
Satellite, huh ? You will probably gain a lot by forcing users to a transparent proxy. You can do lots of TCP tuning on a server that would be either impossible on some Microsoft TCP/IP stacks or too expensive in support hours to do on the end users machines. Caching also comes to mind. > You got me thinking about the ack packets. Besides possibly a queue > type, what do you think about prioritizing them high? High priority for ACK packets usually turns into better performance perception on any network. I would try it for sure, but consider the proxy option above for your specific scenario (not the usual WISP one). Rubens -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wants You! Join today! http://signup.wispa.org/ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- WISPA Wireless List: wireless@wispa.org Subscribe/Unsubscribe: http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless Archives: http://lists.wispa.org/pipermail/wireless/
