Don't remember. Solved the problem with matching machines
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> Date: 11/12/2013 9:10 PM (GMT-05:00) To: WISPA General List <wireless@wispa.org> Subject: Re: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool Don't use cheap chipsets on the laptop. Who shipped the laptops you had problems with? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Nov 12, 2013 9:09 PM, "Bob Moldashel" <lakel...@gbcx.net> wrote: We have seen download/upload irregularities when using it with different types of laptops/processors. Overall it is a good tool. Something to check first is to test laptop to laptop with a cossover cable and see what your results are first. Nothing like chasing a problem that isn't there. -B- On Nov 12, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Bret Clark <bcl...@spectraaccess.com> wrote: I've used it on a PI and found it to be very accurate. Next to Iperf, put/get files from an FTP server provides good throughput measurements. On 11/12/2013 02:49 PM, Clay Stewart wrote: Is it accurate using it on a Raspberry-pi? I was loading up my first one today to try out Iperf. Since someone on this thread mentioned 'CPU', I was wondering if that would be an issue on a PI? Clocked at 800Mhz.. On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 2:35 PM, Mike Hammett <wispawirel...@ics-il.net> wrote: iPerf is very accurate in what it tells you. What you draw from those conclusions may or may not be accurate. ----- Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com From: "Sam" <w...@csilogan.com> To: wireless@wispa.org Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 12:50:51 PM Subject: [WISPA] iPerf as a Real-World Performance Simulation Tool Has anyone used iPerf before? I'm curious of your thoughts as to the reliability, and how the results would map to a real-world environment. For example, a friend was testing some 3.65 radios (which had no connection to the Internet) using iPerf. Based upon the iPerf results, a determination was made regarding maximum concurrent users per AP and maximum aggregate bandwidth capacity of the radio. For the maximum concurrent users I believe they tested this at several different download and upload speed for the fictional users. Having never used iPerf, I don't know if the results from their tests (which were very poor by the way - much lower than common configurations of DL/UL rates as well as number of users per AP I've read many of you describing on these lists) map reasonably to what one would expect from a given AP, or if they tend to be wonky. Thanks, Sam _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless -- -- SCS Clay Stewart CEO, Tye River Farms, Inc., DBA Stewart Computer Services 434.263.6363 O 434.942.6510 C cstew...@stewartcomputerservices.com “We Keep You Up and Running” Wireless Broadband Programming Network Services _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
_______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
