I agree with you, Faisal The main problem with the CCR (see the forum) is that 6.x is still buggy and not everything runs in multicore/SMP
So not sure if the CCR is TODAY the best choice for some tasks. I have tested also 6.x on some RB1200 and RB1100 and after sometime it shows some strange behaviour. The winbox looses some menus, some features are no more there (e.g. interfaces) etc I do not like to reboot my edge router.... I hope they will fix soon all the issues with the 6.x and CCR but today I am not sure it could go in production in my network, still waiting to see better maturity Just my 2 Euro Cents ;) > Personal Opinion.... > > I believe the CCR is a greatly suited as a Tower Router or (Customer > network facing Router, bridge, traffic shaping, filter rules etc) > > However I believe at the present x86 (i3/i5/i7) based MT are more suited > for Internet Facing Edge routers (doing Multiple Full BGP Tables etc, > very little to no filter rules...) > > Depending on Traffic load and (smaller) network design , it is quiet > possible to use either one as a 'all in one' but in the long run it > would be better to break out into two separate boxes. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 -- Ing. Paolo Di Francesco Level7 s.r.l. unipersonale Sede operativa: Largo Montalto, 5 - 90144 Palermo C.F. e P.IVA 05940050825 Fax : +39-091-8772072 assistenza: (+39) 091-8776432 web: http://www.level7.it _______________________________________________ Wireless mailing list Wireless@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
