This is my fear as well.
On November 12, 2014 6:29:14 AM AKST, Tim Kerns <t...@cv-access.com> wrote:
>Don't you think they will throttle us also...
>
>Make us pay for fast lane just like their other customers... only worst
>for
>us.. think ESPN
>
>Don't misunderstand me... I don't like the net neutrality as its being
>proposed, but I also don't want some services favored over others and
>forced
>to pay more the get them equal.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Matt Hoppes
>Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 4:05 AM
>To: WISPA General List
>Subject: Re: [WISPA] [SPAM] "FCC Confirms Delay of New Net Neutrality
>Rules
>Until 2015"
>
>Is there any more information on what exactly the FCC is proposing to
>propose? I know there was Title II thrown around....
>
>How would that impact us, or any other carrier? Net neutrality is
>about
>giving all packets equal access -- if I already do that, do I have
>anything to fear?
>
>I for one would love to see Net neutrality fall on its face, the big
>ISPs start throtteling traffic, and just have customers driven to us
>little guys who don't throttle.
>
>On 11/11/14, 8:33 PM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
>> from:
>>
>http://tech.slashdot.org/story/14/11/11/2345213/fcc-confirms-delay-of-new-net-neutrality-rules-until-2015
>>
>> "/The Federal Communications Commission will abandon
>>
><http://www.dailydot.com/politics/net-neutrality-fcc-tom-wheeler-delayed-obama/>
>
>> its earlier
>> promise
>>
><https://www.fcc.gov/blog/setting-record-straight-fcc-s-open-internet-rules>
>
>> to
>> make a decision on new net neutrality rules this year. Instead, FCC
>> Press Secretary Kim Hart said, "there will not be a vote on open
>> internet rules on the December meeting agenda. That would mean rules
>> would now be finalized in 2015." The FCC's confirmation of the delay
>> came just as President Barack Obama launched a campaign
>>
><http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2014/11/10/statement-president-net-neutrality>
>
>> to
>> persuade the agency to reclassify broadband Internet service as a
>public
>> utility./Opensource.com is also running an interview with a legal
>> advisor at the FCC
>>
><http://opensource.com/government/14/11/fcc-advisor-talks-net-neutrality>.
>> He says, "There will be a burden on providers. The question is, 'Is
>that
>> burden justified?' And I think our answer is 'Yes.'""
>> --
>>
>> Josh Reynolds, Chief Information Officer
>> SPITwSPOTS, www.spitwspots.com <http://www.spitwspots.com>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> Wireless@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireless mailing list
>Wireless@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>_______________________________________________
>Wireless mailing list
>Wireless@wispa.org
>http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
Wireless@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
