How does this affect new installations?

On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Fred Goldstein <[email protected]> wrote:

> On 3/6/2017 12:48 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:
>
> How about towers that were installed previously?
>
>
> "Grandfathered Wireless Broadband Service" (3.65) licenses will remain in
> effect until 2020. If they expire before then, they can be renewed for up
> to that date. If they happened to be issued in the 2010-2013 time frame
> before the CBSD docket opened, then they get their full 10 years, which can
> make some of them run as late as March, 2023. For strange reasons I won't
> get into here, that can have unfortunate consequences, so there may be
> pressure on some WISPs to transition them anyway in 2020.
>
> Grandfathered devices fall into two categories. If you Registered them in
> ULS before 4/17/15 and had them in revenue service by 4/17/16, then they
> become Incumbent in CBRS and are entitled to very strong protection against
> other CBRS devices, on their current frequencies. That can have a 17 km
> radius, IIRC. If they were not registered, they get protection to 5.4 km.
> You can still add devices, but they are not treated the same as the ones
> that were registered. So if you had registered a device on that tower, it
> gets good protection until 2020.
>
> Once the GWBS licenses expire, the device either has to be re-approved as
> a CBSD (some will, some won't) or go off the air. I'd expect the LTE and
> some WiMax and other current clean-signal devices to get CBSD upgrades and
> approval; I don't expect any Wi-Fi-derivative devices to do so. Just
> speculating, though.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 11:40 AM, Fred Goldstein <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On 3/6/2017 12:32 PM, Marco Coelho wrote:
>>
>>> I've been off-line for a while.  What is the latest set of decisions
>>> from the FCC with the 3.65 band?
>>>
>>>
>> A second Report and Order was issued in May, 2016. Since then, the action
>> has moved to WinnForum, which is producing the standards for how to
>> actually use the band. That includes protocols for how a CBRS Device (CBSD)
>> will communicate with a Spectrum Authorization System (SAS) and how the
>> several SASs will communicate with each other. WISPA is represented there
>> by myself and Richard Bernhardt. As of now, the first release of the
>> protocols has been published, basically to allow vendors to start
>> development, and we're working on further versions that are actually
>> practical. Some guesses are that equipment using CBRS may become available,
>> with FCC-approved SAS service, sometime around the end of the year.
>>
>> --
>>  Fred R. Goldstein      k1io    fred "at" interisle.net
>>  Interisle Consulting Group
>>  +1 617 795 2701
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wireless mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Marco C. Coelho
> Argon Technologies Inc.
> POB 875
> Greenville, TX 75403-0875
> 903-455-5036 <(903)%20455-5036>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing 
> [email protected]http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>
>
> --
>  Fred R. Goldstein      k1io    fred "at" interisle.net
>  Interisle Consulting Group
>  +1 617 795 2701 <(617)%20795-2701>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireless mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless
>
>


-- 
Bois d'Arc Farm
Cody Bardwell
Crop Operations/IT
334-654-4539
_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to