An opinion from this peanut gallery is that o-jit-pie is not interested in serving the American public or the governments interests, he is only interested in serving himself with all the money he can garner from his large corporate donors.  Folks the mafia has taken over the government.  We can cry all we want, the tone-deaf aren't listening.

J


On 12/28/2017 08:27 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller wrote:
I look forward to reading everyone's comments - especially after I stole some very useful paragraphs from a few of you. :)

    ----- Original Message -----
    *From:* Ken Garnett <mailto:[email protected]>
    *To:* 'WISPA General List' <mailto:[email protected]> ;
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> ; 'Principal WISPA
    Member List' <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Sent:* Thursday, December 28, 2017 10:17 PM
    *Subject:* Re: [WISPA] Last day to file CBRS Comments is today.
    Please file ifyou have not already done so.

    Done.

    Proceeding:17-258

    Confirmation #:201712293080913313

    Submitted:Dec 28, 2017 8:07:52 PM

    Status:RECEIVED

    Name(s) of Filer(s)Cal.net, Inc.

    - Ken Garnett
      Chief Technology Officer
      Cal.Net
      530-672-1078, x103

    *From:*[email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>
    [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Mark Radabaugh
    *Sent:* Thursday, December 28, 2017 4:58 AM
    *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>; Principal
    WISPA Member List <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>;
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
    *Subject:* [WISPA] Last day to file CBRS Comments is today. Please
    file if you have not already done so.

    WISPA Members,

    We are in the middle of one of the most important fights in the
    history of our industry. *We need every member (operators,
    vendors, service providers) to submit comments to the FCC*.  More
    background and an outline to help you cover all the bases are in
    Steve Coran’s email below.

    Please take 30 minutes today and put together a letter to the FCC
    on CBRS.  If you need assistance, or want help reviewing a draft,
    contact me, Mark Radabaugh, or Steve Coran off list and we’ll help
    you.

    We have also developed a website that will enable you to see the
    difference between census tracts (the current proposal for
    allocating PALs) and PEAS.  Instructions for accessing that
    website are below.

    If you would prefer to have a KMZ file showing PEA's that you can
    use, you can download it here:

    https://www.dropbox.com/s/y5b1zf1mtm5b0v2/FCC_PEAs_website.kmz?dl=0

    *THIS IS CRITICALLY IMPORTANT *

    *Citizens Broadband Radio Service*

    *GN Docket No. 17-258*

    **

    *Suggestions for Filing Comments regarding Notice of Proposed
    Rulemaking*

    *Deadline: Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 11:59 pm Eastern Time*

    **

    */Background/*

    *//*

    On October 24, 2017, the FCC released a Notice of Proposed
    Rulemaking (NPRM) that would fundamentally change the Citizens
    Broadband Radio Service (CBRS), which includes the 3550-3650 MHz
    band and the existing 3650-3700 MHz band.  WISPA will be filing
    extensive Comments opposing many of the proposed rule changes, and
    we believe it is very important for individual members – WISPs,
    manufacturers, vendors, etc. – to also file Comments.

    *//*

    */Summary of Current Rules That Will Be Changed If WISPs Do Not
    Comment/*

    *//*

    The FCC adopted rules in April 2015 to establish the CBRS band. 
    The band employs a three-tier spectrum access model. /Incumbent
    Access/ (earth stations and military) that must always be
    protected from interference; /Priority Access/, which will be
    auctioned by the FCC according to census tracts and must protect
    incumbents; and /General Authorized Access/ (GAA), a “license by
    rule” service that must protect Incumbent and Priority Access
    use.  The FCC allocated up to 70 megahertz for Priority Access
    Licenses (PALs) and the remaining 80 megahertz for GAA use.  The
    FCC also will allow GAA use opportunistically when and where
    Priority Access Licenses (PALs) are not in use.  The model will be
    governed by a Spectrum Access System (SAS) that will enforce the
    three-tier approach.

    In addition to fixed wireless service, the CBRS band is viewed as
    an “innovation band” to enable other business models such as
    Industrial Internet of Things, private networks, venues (e.g.,
    airports, arenas, shopping malls), neutral host networks and others.

    */Summary of Proposed Changes to the Rules Sought by the Mobile
    Industry/*

    *//*

    Here is a link to the proposed regulatory action that the FCC is
    
considering:***https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-17-134A1.pdf**)*

    *PLEASE BE SURE TO READ Paragraphs 9-27, which are relevant to the
    proposals discussed below *

    The FCC, at the request of the mobile industry, is proposing
    changes to the PAL rules so they are friendlier to national mobile
    carriers.  If adopted, the proposed rules would effectively
    foreclose small companies that wish to acquire protected spectrum
    for small areas and create a “5G-only” band available only to the
    large mobile wireless providers.  The specific proposals are as
    follows:

    Ø*Conduct PAL auctions based on Partial Economic Areas (PEAs) *or
    other geographic areas that are larger than census tracts, such as
    counties.  There are 416 PEAs and more than 74,000 census tracts. 
    Census tracts are optimized at a population of ~4,000.

    Ø*Extend Priority Access License (PAL) terms from 3 years to 10
    years and add a “renewal expectancy”* that could make PALs
    essentially perpetual.

    **

    *These proposed rule changes would make the cost of acquiring
    protected PALs through auction significantly higher, pricing out
    many small would-be bidders and essentially ensuring that the
    large mobile wireless carriers have exclusive access to the
    spectrum for an indefinite period of time over a large geographic
    area.  Smaller providers, even if they had the means to outbid the
    large carriers, would be forced to acquire large-area licenses
    that are likely much larger than the targeted areas WISPs would
    want to serve.*

    */Guidelines/*

    //

    ·Please review the NPRM

    ·You can also review WISPA’s recent comments in meetings with
    Chairman Pai and Commissioner O’Rielly, which are attached to this
    email

    ·File comments unique to your company, not “cookie-cutter” comments

    o*BE AS SPECIFIC AS YOU CAN BE – THE FCC WILL LOOK AT THE
    SUBSTANCE OF THE ARGUMENTS MADE, NOT OVERBROAD STATEMENTS*

    oExplain what your company does

    §How many customers do you have?

    §What part(s) of the country do you serve?  How rural is the area
    you serve?

    §What service do you currently offer (e.g., speed)?

    oAs appropriate, emphasize:

    §Your company’s investments in 3650-3700 MHz, especially if those
    investment were made in reliance on the CBRS rules that were
    adopted in April 2015

    §Plans for gaining access to the CBRS band

    §How expanding the geographic area of PALs to an area larger than
    census tracts will dramatically reduce your ability to make
    competitive bids at the PAL auction, because you have to acquire a
    much larger area than you plan to use to connect unserved and/or 
    provide better service to your existing customers

    §Benefits of having the ability to get access to 100 megahertz of
    mid-band spectrum

    §Any reduction in investment based on the threat of the proposals
    in the NPRM

    §Note that you have an experimental license (if you do) and what
    the purpose of the trial is

    §Problems that additional spectrum will solve (e.g., investment,
    congestion, throughput, QoS, interference, etc.

    oInclude maps of your service area, showing PEA boundaries, and
    identifying areas where licensed mid-band spectrum would help you
    connect additional customers or provide better service to existing
    customers

    oFocus on consumers

    oFor rural providers:  focus on extending fixed broadband service
    to rural Americans that lack broadband or choice

    oBe clear that you oppose the proposals to increase the size of
    PALs or lengthen the term of licenses

    ·We are happy to answer questions, provide suggestions and assist
    in filing your Comments.  Please contact the WISPA DC team (email
    [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> who
    will forward your request for assistance to the appropriate member
    of WISPA’s team)

    *INSTRUCTIONS FOR FILING YOUR COMMENTS WITH THE FCC IN GN Docket
    No. 17-258*

    **

    Comments can be prepared as a double-spaced document with a
    caption, or as a single-spaced letter.

    Comments are filed electronically at the FCC’s ECFS web site:
    https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filings

    Proceedings:  17-258

    Name of Filer:  enter your company’s name, not your name

    Type of Filing:  pull down menu, enter “Comment” right at the top
    of the menu

    File Number, Report Number, Bureau ID number:  leave these blank

    *_Please be sure to file by Thursday, December 28 at 11:59 pm
    Eastern Time_*

    Thank you.

    Attached is a link to a site which will allow you to overlay
    state-by-state census tracts with Partial Economic Areas (PEA). 
    Registration is required to access the site, use this registration
    form <https://wispa.allpointsbroadband.net/accounts/register/>. 
    After registering, you can select the states to display census
    tracts from. and add the PEA layer in the menu on the left. You
    can click on any tract or PEA to display data about it in a popup
    window.

    https://wispa.allpointsbroadband.net/

    A few notes:

      * The order you add layers to the map matters; think of it like
        adding physical layers.  If you add tract layers first, then
        the PEA layer, when you click you will see data about the PEA
        you clicked.  If you add the PEA layer first, then tracts, you
        will see census data when you click because the tract layer
        will be "on top"
      * Due to technical limitations you can only display a handful
        layers concurrently, if you try to select too many they will
        not load, and you may need to refresh the page
      * When zoomed-out, holes may appear in the tract layers,
        especially around population centers.  When you zoom in those
        holes will fill in.

    For technical or registration issues please contact Michael
    Hespenheide ([email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>)

    ------------------------------------------------------------------------
    _______________________________________________
    Wireless mailing list
    [email protected]
    http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless



_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

_______________________________________________
Wireless mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/wireless

Reply via email to