https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16420
Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
--- Comment #4 from Anders Broman <anders.bro...@ericsson.com> ---
> So the need is one of
>
> - a way of writing a pcap file that older libpcap-based utilities understand,
> presumably by stripping the EXPORTED_PDU layer
If your utility does not read the exported PDU format why use exported PDU in
the first place? Not knowing the use case makes it hard to recomend something.
But I think you need to adopt your utility to undersand the exported PDU format
to the extent you are using it for. E.G handle the protocol name of "ip"(?).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
