https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15984
--- Comment #8 from tinker <tk1061...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Greg Hazel from comment #4)
> (In reply to Peter Wu from comment #1)
> > I have not looked into your patch, but have you written it based on a spec
> > linked from
> > https://ask.wireshark.org/question/9819/quic-malformed-packet-error/?
>
> Sort of. The Google Doc is incomplete, and the chromium quic implementation
> identifies the packet as "ietf" quic, which it is not. Based on those two, I
> got the gquic parser working for my case.
Hi, Is there any update about this feature, there are much GQUIC Q046 flow on
internet now, because of the chrome latest version has used it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
