https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10532

--- Comment #5 from Anish Bhatt <an...@chelsio.com> ---
> I ask a colleague for the IE 0xbb. This required some time to get an answer.

That's fine, to me it looks like extra data and not an EI, as I could not find
it in the spec and the length is off.

> 
> I hope I can send in some days more traces. But look to the other file
> "E-LMI Status on the UNI_stop ccm on NNI". It contains in frame 5 the IE
> 0x21 too.

Yes, I have this completed. I was hoping to finish everything at once.
> 
> How we get forward?
> Do you want to wait to get the answer from my colleague and more traces.

I'll push the stuff I've already done for review, and add 0xbb when you get
more information on it.

> 
> Or do you see a possibility to finish the work you have done and give the
> code to review that a get a build with your changes.
> If we get the answer and more traces I can reopen this bug, or open a new
> one.
> 
> Or do you see a possibility to give me a "special" version of windows binary
> to work with the better decode funktionality.

There will be one automatically generated when I push for review, I'll paste a
link here when that's done.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to