https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13655

--- Comment #5 from Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> ---
(In reply to Guy Harris from comment #2)
> I'll look at trying with an ASAN build.

Mr. ASAN says:

ASAN:DEADLYSIGNAL
=================================================================
==16594==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: SEGV on unknown address 0x000000000008 (pc
0x0001061e3f9e bp 0x7fff5d9c3500 sp 0x7fff5d9c34e0 T0)
==16594==The signal is caused by a READ memory access.
==16594==Hint: address points to the zero page.
    #0 0x1061e3f9d in wmem_list_foreach wmem_list.c:267
    #1 0x104e11068 in bootp_cleanup_protocol packet-bootp.c:6343
    #2 0x103e9649c in g_slist_foreach gslist.c:896
    #3 0x104ba1fdd in cleanup_dissection packet.c:343
    #4 0x104b87b52 in epan_free epan.c:337
    #5 0x102255dca in cf_close file.c:477
    #6 0x1026fb2ad in MainWindow::testCaptureFileClose(QString,
MainWindow::FileCloseContext) main_window.cpp:1914

        ...

==16594==Register values:
rax = 0x0000100000000001  rbx = 0x000061500000cb40  rcx = 0x000061d00076b860 
rdx = 0x0000000000000000  
rdi = 0x0000000000000008  rsi = 0x0000000104e1be40  rbp = 0x00007fff5d9c3500 
rsp = 0x00007fff5d9c34e0  
 r8 = 0x000061d00001bc80   r9 = 0x0000000000000001  r10 = 0x0000000000000005 
r11 = 0x0000000000000000  
r12 = 0x0000100000000000  r13 = 0x0000100000000000  r14 = 0x0000000000000000 
r15 = 0x0000000104e1be40  
AddressSanitizer can not provide additional info.
SUMMARY: AddressSanitizer: SEGV wmem_list.c:267 in wmem_list_foreach

which doesn't add much - in particular, for what it's worth, it's not reporting
any out-of-bounds stores *before* the list is freed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via:    Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives:    https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
             mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe

Reply via email to