https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14700
sau...@locoslab.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sau...@locoslab.com
--- Comment #17 from sau...@locoslab.com ---
As far as I can see, there is no 'incorrect' re-assembly happening here: in
frame 102, the reassembled packet consists of 2 fragments. The fragments are in
the right order and belong to the packet in the sense of matching datagram tag,
etc. The addresses are also correct fd00:db8::ff:fe00:401 ->
fd00:db8::ff:fe00:0. As has been noted, as an external observer in contrast to
the recipient, it is hard to define 'correct' re-assembly, especially in the
multi-hop case.
I think taking the link-layer destination address into account would make the
re-assembly less surprising and is a good idea, but I would not consider it
'more correct'. I think Peter's patch is a nice implementation.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
