https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15205
--- Comment #14 from Guy Harris <g...@alum.mit.edu> ---
So if you truly cannot rely on *anything* about the data that arrives on the
standard error from an extcap program, then you should define a mechanism, with
a *defined protocol*, for reporting errors, encourage the use of *that* rather
than the standard error for reporting errors, and just read what you can from
the standard error and report that.
Only errors from code *not* under the control of the extcap program's author
would show up on the standard error, and would indicate some failure on the
part of the program (i.e., probably a bug of some sort).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-bugs mailing list <wireshark-bugs@wireshark.org>
Archives: https://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-bugs
Unsubscribe: https://www.wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-bugs
mailto:wireshark-bugs-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
