Michael Lum wrote:
> I think you're right.
>
> I had it implemented that way originally.
>
> I had a preference for TCAP to be either ITU or ANSI.
>
> I believe GSM MAP has to be carried on ITU TCAP and ANSI MAP on ANSI TCAP
> but maybe there were issues with other protocols on top of TCAP that caused
> problems.
>
> I don't know the history behind the removal of the preference.
Basically the TCAP dissector was rewritten to be generated from ASN.1
instead of being hand written. In the process the dissector was
modified to automatically figure out the TCAP standard (which is pretty
easy since the message types are different between the two).
However, the preference shouldn't really matter as much as the idea of
TCAP having separate ITU and ANSI SSN dissector tables. Which it
appears to still have, however there's a bug in the ANSI MAP dissector
SSN preference code:
> static void range_delete_callback(guint32 ssn)
> {
> if (ssn) {
> delete_ansi_tcap_subdissector(ssn , ansi_map_handle);
> add_itu_tcap_subdissector(ssn , ansi_map_handle);
> }
> }
Why is it deleting an ANSI SSN and adding an ITU one?
Does fixing that fix your problem?
HTH,
-J
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Anders Broman
> Sent: August 22, 2006 1:10 PM
> To: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: ANSI MAP / TCAP dissector hooks
>
> Hi,
> There is a problem when ssn's overlap. I originally had ANSI MAP and GSM MAP
> overlapping but still got it decoded as ANSI MAP, changing the GSM MAP
> preference got it to not decode then changing the ANSI MAP Preference again
> got proper decoding.
>
> Perhaps the whole preference setting should be done in TCAP instead?
>
> Brg
> Anders
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande-----
> Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Michael Lum
> Skickat: den 22 augusti 2006 22:02
> Till: 'Developer support list for Wireshark'
> Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: ANSI MAP / TCAP dissector hooks
>
> There may be a couple of problems here.
>
> The capture file contains ANSI MAP not GSM MAP.
>
>
>
>
> --
> Michael Lum Principal Software Engineer
> 4600 Jacombs Road +1.604.276.0055
> Richmond, B.C.
> Canada V6V 3B1
> UTStarcom Canada, Inc.
> CDMA Division
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Morriss
> Sent: August 22, 2006 6:28 AM
> To: Developer support list for Wireshark
> Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] FW: ANSI MAP / TCAP dissector hooks
>
>
> Anders Broman wrote:
>> Hi,
>> As far as I know the only change was to use range rather than a single
>> ssn value in the preferences of ANSI MAP, probably you got owerlaping
>> ssn definitions in your preferences ( CAMEL ,GSM MAP, RANAP ... ) what
>> does it say at the ssn entry in the SCCP part of the dissection?
>
> Hmm, when I load that capture file the SCCP portion says:
>
> SSN: 6
> [Linked to TCAP, TCAP ssn linked to GSM_MAP]
>
> which looks OK.
>
> However, the bottom of the TCAP protocol tree says says "BER Error:
> Wrong field in sequence [...]".
>
> I suppose that's preventing the TCAP dissector from calling the GSM_MAP
> dissector.
>
> [If so should such BER errors fail an assertion or something so the packet
> shows up as malformed/dissector bug/whatever??]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Michael Lum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: August 9, 2006 12:18 PM
>> To: 'wireshark-dev@wireshark.org'
>> Subject: ANSI MAP / TCAP dissector hooks
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> why was the way ANSI MAP hooks into TCAP changed?
>>
>> I believe there is a problem with it.
>>
>> I have attached a capture file with the following:
>>
>> SCTP
>> M2UA
>> MTP3 (ITU)
>> SCCP
>> TCAP (ANSI)
>> ANSI MAP
>>
>> My preferences were set to:
>>
>> MTP3 (ANSI)
>> ANSI MAP (SSN RANGE 5-14)
>>
>> Procedure:
>>
>> 1. Start Ethereal
>> 2. Set filters
>> 3. Load file
>>
>> Frames show up as SCCP (ANSI), ERR and DT2
>>
>> 4. Edit preferences, change MTP3 -> ITU
>>
>> With Ethereal 0.99.0 everything works fine the four frames come out
>> decoded as ANSI MAP
>> with:
>>
>> UDT QueryWithPermInvoke(Last) Location Request UDT
>> QueryWithPermInvoke(Last) Routing Request UDT ResponseRetRes(Last) UDT
>> ResponseRetRes(Last)
>>
>> Following the same procedure with Wireshark 0.99.2 the decode goes as
>> far as TCAP but not ANSI MAP.
>>
>> To get the decode to work properly I have to:
>>
>> 5. Edit preferences, change ANSI MAP SSN Range to something
>> different, apply
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wireshark-dev mailing list
> Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
> http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
