I have got the same idea meantime. T.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LEGO Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 12:33 PM To: Developer support list for Wireshark Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] COPY_ADDRESS and g_malloc() may be we should have EP_COPY_ADDRESS, SE_COPY_ADDRESS and PE_COPY_ADDRESS instead. On 11/13/06, Kukosa, Tomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > does not it make sence to change g_malloc() in COPY_ADDRESS to > se_alloc() ? > It seems that it is not freed in most cases of usage. > Do wee need anywhere longer lifetime then se_alloc() has? > > Tomas > > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > -- This information is top security. When you have read it, destroy yourself. -- Marshall McLuhan _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
