On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 08:21:24AM +0000, ronnie sahlberg wrote: > I dont think it is really realistic to have all autogenerated files > always compile without any warnings.
Which warnings do you have in mind specifically? Why do you think they can't be avoided? > Maybe we should instead split Makefile.common up into three parts : > > First part : normal dissectors > > Second part : ANS2WRS generated dissectors which take extra compile > time flags and definitions to suppress artefacts from the compiler. I think they should just be generated from their "real sources" on each build, thus removing the need to manually rebuild them at all. > Third part : PIDL generated dissectors that once again take extra > compile parameters and definitions. dito. ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev