Guy Harris wrote:
> Bob Doolittle wrote:
>
>   
>>      alp_dgram_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(ti, ett_alp_dgram);
>>     
>
> ett_alp_dgram - and ett_alp_commonr - aren't -1, right?

Right.  They were both initialized in the proto_register_* routines
by calling proto_register_subtree_array().  I'm following the plugins/docsis
model and auto-generating a plugin.c file, which correctly is handling the
registration and handoff of both dissectors.

-Bob

_______________________________________________
Wireshark-dev mailing list
Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org
http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev

Reply via email to