Guy Harris wrote: > Bob Doolittle wrote: > > >> alp_dgram_tree = proto_item_add_subtree(ti, ett_alp_dgram); >> > > ett_alp_dgram - and ett_alp_commonr - aren't -1, right?
Right. They were both initialized in the proto_register_* routines by calling proto_register_subtree_array(). I'm following the plugins/docsis model and auto-generating a plugin.c file, which correctly is handling the registration and handoff of both dissectors. -Bob _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev