On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:08:57AM +0200, Tomasz Noi?ski wrote: > On Wed, 16 May 2007 15:48:36 -0700 > Guy Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Perhaps we need to have the key for the protocol data routines be a > > frame number and an offset within the frame, so that there can be > > multiple protocol data items within a link-layer frame. > > I think "offset within a frame" might be not enough: For example, in > my case, I decode the packets first, creating a nev tvb with > tvb_new_real_data(). So, unless there's some tvb-magic I don't know > about, simple offset just isn't enough. > > Numbering packets manually inside a frame (for example, as an > alternative to providing an offset, as Steve suggested) might be the > best solution...
Would you mind sharing the code you have so far so we can study it and see if the offset would work or not? Steve _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
