Stephen Fisher wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 06:05:38PM -0000, Neil Piercy wrote: > > >>I know there is per-packet info, but is there a way of >>adding/retrieving per PDU info which copes with multiple PDUs in a >>packet ? How does a dissector even know if it is handfling the first, >>second etc PDU in a packet ? > > > This has been requested before, but has not been implemented to date in > Wireshark. A workaround you can use is to use a linked list from GLib > (which has a nice easy interface to them) and store that in the per > packet info. Each item in your list would correspond to a different > PDU.
But, as Neil asked, how would you know which PDU you were handling in the dissector? > One of us should get around to implementing per-pdu packet info in > Wireshark itself. It wouldn't be too difficult. All we need is spare > time :) Hrm; it gets quite a lot harder when your PDUs can themselves span multiple packets (ie, there is no correspondence between PDUs and packets). See H.223 for details... Richard _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
