2008/3/15, Andrew Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Stig Bjørlykke wrote: > > On 13. mars. 2008, at 15.51, Peter Johansson wrote: > > > >> Could this then be of the same type of issue that is with adns, hence > >> it is required to recompile libsmi too if using another compiler for > >> Wireshark on Windows than MSVC 6. Developer Studio 2005EE for > instance? > > > > > > > > Does it work correctly on win32 with user specified MIBs without > > running in the debugger? > > Or do we have to make some changes before releasing 1.0? Like revert > > r24569 and live with the memory leakage? > > > > I'm getting crashes on win32 with 0.99.8 having a custom MIB with > > duplicated DESCRIPTION field (attached), so we probably have some more > > issues using libsmi... > > Does your custom MIB work if you define it as attached? > If it does it might be a libsmi bug. > > -- > There's no point in being grown up if you can't be childish sometimes. > -- Dr. Who > > MY-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN > > IMPORTS > MODULE-IDENTITY, enterprises > FROM SNMPv2-SMI > ; > > myValues MODULE-IDENTITY > LAST-UPDATED "200802270000Z" > ORGANIZATION "Private" > CONTACT-INFO "Stig" > DESCRIPTION "My Description" > REVISION "200802270000Z" > DESCRIPTION "Version 1.0" > ::= { thalesNorwayAS 4 } > > thalesNorwayAS OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { enterprises 3752 } > > END > > > _______________________________________________ > Wireshark-dev mailing list > Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org > http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev > > There are more (multiple) recent versions of libsmi than 0.4.5, why was 0.4.5 choosen (perhaps because it was the one that was available at the time of introduction). Should a newer version of the library be considered? This might help with some of the crashes, it will not however address the double free calls (on Windows).
/ Peter
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev