On Apr 30, 2008, at 11:05 AM, Peter Fuller wrote: > > In the past, I have come across some data that was one transport > layer carried in another (TCP carrying UDP).
I.e., a byte stream containing a sequence of UDP header+payload items? (The UDP header contains a length, so that can be done without requiring a protocol in between TCP and UDP as an adaptation layer.) > Is there a reason that the transport layers are not > included in the 'Decode As...' list ? Because nobody's made the transport layers register themselves as belonging in that list. It might be possible to make UDP do so, *if* the IP endpoint addresses of the encapsulated UDP packets are the same as the IP endpoint addresses of the TCP connection (otherwise, there needs to be a protocol in between TCP and UDP to provide those addresses). _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org http://www.wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
