Hi, I moved the expert item inside of the IF statement instead.
Regards Anders _____ Från: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För Martin Mathieson Skickat: den 19 juni 2008 14:38 Till: wireshark-dev@wireshark.org Ämne: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 25485:/trunk/epan/dissectors/ /trunk/epan/dissectors/: packet-per.c You just beat me to it. I wondered if there should be a continue or return following the PER_NOT_DECODED_YET at line 1868? Martin On Thu, Jun 19, 2008 at 1:36 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev <http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=25485> &revision=25485 User: stig Date: 2008/06/19 05:36 AM Log: Initialize new_offset. Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ Changes Path Action +1 -0 packet-per.c Modified _______________________________________________ Wireshark-commits mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-commits
_______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list Wireshark-dev@wireshark.org https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
