Hello Don, Seems that your unistim patch didn't go down well, so has basically been reverted. Could you please work with Bill ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and Joerg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) to get this heuristics things out of the way?
Thanx, Jaap -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [Wireshark-dev] [Wireshark-commits] rev 26904: /trunk/plugins/unistim/ /trunk/plugins/unistim/: packet-unistim.c Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 10:31:57 +0100 From: Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> To: Developer support list for Wireshark <[email protected]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 12:20:25AM +0100, Jaap Keuter wrote: > Care to comment on this one? > Frankly I'm getting tired of going back and forth with this thing. > Can't we sort it out once and for all? The only comment I can give is, that in current svn head using port 5000 for Unistim still eats TAPA packets. I've changed it back to the old comment and port 0 ciao Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev _______________________________________________ Wireshark-dev mailing list [email protected] https://wireshark.org/mailman/listinfo/wireshark-dev
