Hi Gerald, Yes it does. We might need to put up on the Wiki or so "a things to do before we can call this release ready" list. The items you listed can be on there as well as trying to find volunteers to work on the update of the user manual. Stuff like that.
Thanx, Jaap Gerald Combs wrote: > Ulf Lamping wrote: >> Gerald Combs schrieb: >>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>> Hash: SHA1 >>> >>> I'm proud to announce the release of Wireshark 1.0.5. >>> >> Hi Gerald! >> >> Good news :-) >> >> Any ideas, when you want to make the current dev 1.1.x the new release >> branch (aka 1.2.0)? Probably next Sharkfest? > > June is so very far away and there are a ton of cool new features in the > trunk. > Do we really have to wait that long? :) > > If I copy /trunk to /trunk-1.2 around March or April, that should give us time > to make one or two testing releases followed by 1.2.0 in time for Sharkfest. > We > would then have to stabilize the following by June: > > - Native OS X support (which depends on Imendio) > - GeoIP support (a Windows DLL needs to be located or created) > - Any other features we add between now and next spring > > Does this sound reasonable? > ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
