Hello Gerald, On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 12:28:57AM +0000, ger...@wireshark.org wrote: > http://anonsvn.wireshark.org/viewvc/viewvc.cgi?view=rev&revision=29005 > > User: gerald > Date: 2009/07/07 05:28 PM > > Log: > Fix several dissector assertions. > > Directory: /trunk/epan/dissectors/ > Changes Path Action > +25 -20 packet-glbp.c Modified
The idea of doing that lastoffset = offset ... stuff was, that I am reverse engineering the protocol and I wanted to be able to safely resume dissection if one element was not of the format that I expected it to have, e.g. have some trailing information. Was there a specific reason to remove that behaviour? Thanks Joerg -- Joerg Mayer <jma...@loplof.de> We are stuck with technology when what we really want is just stuff that works. Some say that should read Microsoft instead of technology. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org> Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe