Hi,
Le vendredi 11 septembre 2009 à 13:12 -0700, vinayak kamath a écrit :
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 11:28 AM, Bill Meier <wme...@newsguy.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Guy Harris
> <g...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> >> On Sep 10, 2009, at 4:30 PM, vinayak kamath wrote:
> >>
> >>> We have our own custom decoder for a tweaked version of
> RTCP protocol.
> >>> Heres the code snippet where in we say anything on this
> udp.port
> >>> send the message to custom decoder.
> >>> ##########################################################
> >>> if(!TWS_PortList("FOO", configFile, (int*)portList,
> MAXPORTS))
> >>> {
> >>> while (count < MAXPORTS && portList[count]!=0)
> >>> {
> >>> dissector_add("udp.port", portList[count],
> foo_handle);
> >>> count++;
> >>> }
> >>> }
> >>> ##########################################################
> >>>
>
> Yes even "Try heuristic sub-dissectors first" preference is not
> set . Even then it decodes as RTCP & not FOO..
I guess someone have to ask it... But are you sure you're initialisation
code is executed?
If yes run it under a debuger, put a breakpoint in the RTCP dissector, a
backtrace will show you the culprit.
Didier
___________________________________________________________________________
Sent via: Wireshark-dev mailing list <wireshark-dev@wireshark.org>
Archives: http://www.wireshark.org/lists/wireshark-dev
Unsubscribe: https://wireshark.org/mailman/options/wireshark-dev
mailto:wireshark-dev-requ...@wireshark.org?subject=unsubscribe
